The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Resident Physicians Well-Being in the Surgical and Primary Care Specialties in the United States and Canada.

PURPOSE:  The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the professional, social, and spiritual activities of resident physicians around the world, impacting wellness and personal relationships. Moreover, social distancing caused significant limitations or shutdown of places of worship, including churches, synagogues, mosques, etc. Our goal was to survey resident physicians in primary care and surgical subspecialties in the United States (U.S.) and Canada and to examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on their well-being. METHODS:  An international cross-sectional study was performed in November 2020, using an anonymous survey of programs in the U.S. and Canada, containing 20 questions to assess the impact of the pandemic on resident participation in social and spiritual activities and the effects on their wellness, and personal relationships. The emails with survey links attached were sent to individual program coordinators from accredited residency training programs in the United States and Canada. This consisted of programs accredited by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA), The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC), and the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). The survey was evenly divided among surgical programs (General Surgery, Neurological Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Urological Surgery, and Integrated Surgical Residency Programs such as Plastic Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Pediatric Surgery, and Vascular Surgery) as well as primary care programs (Internal Medicine and Family Medicine). RESULTS:  A total of 196 residents, 60 primary care residents, and 136 surgery residents participated in the study. Ninety-six participants (49%) were female, and 98 of the participants (50%) were male, with the remainder two residents identifying as "Other." Of the primary care residents, the majority (39, 65%) were female. Conversely, the majority (77, 57%) of surgery residents were male. CONCLUSION:  The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the social lives, relationships, and spiritual well-being of both surgical and primary care resident physicians. However, primary care residents reported significantly greater engagement in personal relationships and were more likely to express feelings of mental and physical exhaustion, prohibiting social attendance.

Efficacy of Incentive Spirometer in Increasing Maximum Inspiratory Volume in an Out-Patient Setting.

Background Incentive spirometry (IS) is the mainstay of care in postoperative patients that has been heavily studied in the inpatient setting. Studies have shown that the utilization of IS improves lung volumes and reduces the rate of pneumonia in post-surgical patients. However, the literature is ambiguous on its benefit as many studies also demonstrate no significant benefit, especially in comparison to early ambulation. Our study sought to determine whether a consistent IS regimen can improve lung function in an outpatient setting. Methods This prospective cohort study included patients in a physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic setting during the COVID pandemic. Patients with severe respiratory disease, baseline cough, those unable to perform deep breathing, fever greater than 100.4 F due to non-pulmonary on initial evaluation, or inability to fill out the forms and complete the study were excluded. Each participant was given the IS along with hands-on instruction on how to use the device and accurately record measurements. Patients were asked to lie down and inhale and exhale through the tube ten times. They were asked to mark the highest volume during their 10 breaths. Patients were instructed to complete this exercise three times a day for 30 days. Patients were also asked to perform light exercises or walking for 20 minutes per day three times a week and postural drainage. Patients were instructed to call their primary care physician if a 20% or more decrease from their baseline was noted or if they experienced any new coughs, fever, or shortness of breath during the 30 days of exercise. Results A total of 48 patients enrolled in the study with a (median) age of 58.0 years (SD 10.2 years), 21 females and 27 males. Baseline maximal inspiration for study participants was 1885.4 mL prior to exercise, with a subsequent increase in lung capacity observed for all participants enrolled in the study. At the end of the study period, week four, the average maximal inspiratory volume was 2235.4 mL. Paired t-test showed a significant difference between baseline (1885.4) and maximum (2235.4) volumes (t=-4.59, p<0.0001). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed no significant difference among Week 1-4 averages (F=1.08, p=0.36). None of the participants reported any symptoms (fever, coughing, shortness of breath) or COVID-19 infection during the 30-days period. None of the participants reported contacting primary care physicians.  Conclusion When prescribed daily breathing exercises with an incentive spirometer, study participants experienced a 16% increase in maximal inspiratory volume over a span of 30 days and did not need to contact their primary care physician during the study period.

Using the Decrease in Trauma Admissions During the COVID-19 Pandemic to Evaluate Compliance With Stay-at-Home and Social Distancing Guidelines.

Introduction The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus was declared a pandemic on March 10, 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO) and has massively burdened healthcare systems with cases exponentially rising throughout the United States and the rest of the world. Since implementing precautions to reduce the spread of this disease, emergency departments have seen a decrease in the number of traumas. By evaluating the differences in the number of trauma admissions in different subgroups of patients, we can assess where to target messaging to increase compliance with these precautions. In this study, we aim to analyze the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on trauma admissions. Methodology This was a retrospective review of the trauma database at our institution, a level 2 trauma center in Southern California, to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the number of traumas. The inclusion criteria were patients activated as traumas, regardless of age. Patients were excluded from the study if they did not have complete information in the trauma database. Data were stratified by date into two groups: (a) COVID period (January to April 2020) and (b) pre-COVID period (January to April 2019). The primary endpoint of this study was to determine whether there was a significant change in the number of patients presenting as trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic. This difference was analyzed and divided into subgroups based on age and trauma type. Results In our review, an average of 279 patients per month presented as trauma from January to April in 2019, and an average of 222 patients per month presented as trauma from January to April 2020 (p = 0.049). We found a significant decrease in the number of patients presenting with the chief complaint of fall and vehicular accident, but a nonsignificant difference in patients presenting as assaults or pedestrian accidents. There was also a significant decrease in the number of traumas in the 18-39 and 65+ age groups and a nonsignificant decrease in the 40-64 age group. It was also noted that the number of trauma admissions in May 2020 increased to 253 compared to 269 in 2019. This increase was most notable in the 18-39 and 40-64 age groups. Discussion As seen in the data, the most notable year-over-year difference was seen in March and April. In California specifically, a stay-at-home order was set in place in March, which was in conjunction with the WHO's declaration of a pandemic. An interesting finding was the significant decrease in patients with traumas in the age groups of 18-39 and 65+ from 2019 to 2020. There was a smaller, nonsignificant decrease in patients aged 40-64. This would be a good group to target with future messaging to increase compliance with health advisories. There was also a notable increase in the number of traumas in May 2020, signaling an end to the cooperation of the majority of people, also indicating that further measures needed to be enacted in all groups. Conclusions COVID-19 has disrupted social structures worldwide. As the pandemic continued, even the observers of stay-at-home and social distancing measures, the 18-39 age group, became fatigued with the guidelines and ventured out into the warming weather and summer activities. This difference in trauma admission due to COVID-19 between subsequent years can highlight the behavioral changes in our patient population and can be further extrapolated to target additional messaging to help reduce the spread of COVID-19.

Retraction: Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Stroke Patients.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9995.].

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Stroke Patients.

Introduction The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS2-CoV-2) induced pandemic (COVID-19 pandemic) has affected healthcare in all aspects, including stroke care. We sought to investigate this effect with analysis of our hospital's stroke treatment protocols as well as stroke volume on state, regional, and national levels. Methods This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from our stroke registry to assess the impact of the SARS2-CoV-2 induced pandemic on the volume of stroke patients presenting to our facility. Demographics collected included age, sex, race, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission, discharge modified Rankin Score (mRS), type of stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, or transient ischemic attack), time of symptom onset, and time to initial imaging. Data were also stratified by date and comparison was made between the intra-COVID-period (March and April 2020), pre-COVID period (March and April 2019), and peri-COVID period (January and February 2020). To determine stroke trends on a national level, we utilized the Get with the Guidelines (GWTG) stroke database to compare stroke volumes in the pre-COVID, peri-COVID, and intra-COVID periods between our hospital, all California hospitals, and the West and Pacific regions. Results There was a significant increase in last known well time (LKWT) to arrival to the emergency department (ED) (LKWT to door) as well as time from arrival to the ED to obtaining a computed tomography (CT) of the head (door to CT) in March 2020 compared to 2019 (p=0.0220 and p=0.0475, respectively). There were significantly fewer transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) in California hospitals as well as in March and April 2020 in comparison to January and February 2020 (p=0.0417). Similarly, there were significantly fewer TIAs in March and April 2019 compared to March and April 2020 (p=0.0360). The decrease in TIAs was also seen at our hospital in both time frame comparisons as well as in West Regional Hospitals in March and April 2020 compared to March and April 2019 (p=0.0111, p=0.0215, and p=0.0414, respectively). Conclusion Stroke care has been disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. We identified a delay in LKWT to door as well as time from door to CT in March 2020 compared to March 2019 at our institution. There was a statistically significant decrease in final diagnosis of TIA at our hospital, all California hospitals, and all West Regional hospitals during the March-April 2020 window, suggesting that some patients with minor stroke symptoms may not be presenting to the hospital in the midst of the pandemic. Strategies to minimize delays in care and maximize functional recovery must continue to evolve as new challenges are met during the COVID-19 pandemic.